Amazon.com
The gospel according to Thomas is an ancient collection of sayings attributed to Jesus and thought to be recorded by his brother Judas, the Twin (Thomas means "twin" in Aramaic). Some scholars suggest that this gospel was collected from New Testament sayings, while others believe it springs from a completely independent author because many of the quotations are not in the New Testament at all. It slept for two millennia in a stone jar until it was accidentally exhumed by a group of fertilizer gatherers in the northern Egyptian desert in 1945. (The gospel is just one document in the fourth-century papyrus library discovered near the city of Nag Hammadi, from which the entire collection gets its name.) Marvin Meyer's distinguished translation includes Coptic text on each left page and the English translation on the right. It is considered by many to be perhaps the closest we'll ever get to reading what was actually said by the historical Jesus. In The Gospel of Thomas, you'll discover a different kind of Christ--a wandering spiritual teacher from Galilee who performs no miracles, reveals little prophecy, announces no apocalypse, and dies for no one's sins. --P. Randall Cohan
Book Description
A fresh, authoritative English translation, with an informative introduction, fascinating explanatory notes, and the Coptic text, with interpretation by Harold Bloom, our pre–eminent literary critic.
Customer Reviews:
For a nonexpert, a thought-provoking volume.......2007-07-04
This is a Gospel allegedly authored by Judas Thomas the Twin. This Gospel does not provide a narrative analysis as the four Gospels of the New Testament do. The focus is the (page 5) "sayings of Jesus." As such, this work is closer to what is called a (page 7) "a collection of sayings." The introductory essay (an introduction and a rather difficult concluding essay by Harold Bloom sandwich the slim volume of sayings) notes that there are three explanations for the "Gospel of Thomas," one of which is that it is (page 13) "independent of the New Testament synoptic gospels, but it is related to oral or written traditions similar to those behind the synoptic gospels." Marvin Mayer, the book's editor, suggests that the Gospel of Thomas (page 13) "preserves sayings that at times appear to be more original than the New Testament parallels."
Bloom's concluding essay uses this Gospel to raise interesting questions about Biblical understanding. Not being an expert, I say nothing more. Individual readers will need to examine his work for themselves and come to their own judgments.
The Gospel itself is interesting, given that quite a few of the "sayings" are very close to what is in the traditional four Gospels. One example:
55 Jesus said, "Fortunate are the poor, for yours is heaven's kingdom."
110 Jesus said, "Let someone who has found the world and has become wealthy renounce the world."
Other apothegms:
1 And he said, "Whoever discovers the interpretation of these sayings will not taste death."
95 Jesus said, "If you have money, do not lend it at interest. Rather give [it] to someone from whom you will not get it back."
And one final saying (discussed at length in the introduction and in Lane's work on the Bible):
114 Simon Peter said to them, "Mary should leave us, for females are not worthy of life."
Jesus said, "Look, I will guide her to make her male, so that she too may become a living spirit resembling you males. For every female who makes herself male will enter heaven's kingdom."
What to make of the Gospel of Thomas? I'm not an expert, but I do find this interesting reading. What it portends for an understanding of Scripture I must leave to others. But the questions that come to mind as one reads the essays and, even more, the text itself, makes this an interesting expenditure of mental energy.
3 Stars and a half..........2007-02-23
I didn't bother reading the introduction and commentary, I went straight for the juice and read the ghospel. As a deist I didn't find it so much different from other ghospels, a bit shorter maybe, but about the same. Maybe less jolly and honky dory, a bit more down with life, good and evil are the same and all that. A bit closer to some eastern phylosophy sort of meaning, but still the same, jesus is the choosen one, he shows the way, but then will leave and leave us to dwell with the BS.
As footnote, did you know that "ghospel" is a wrong word? The original ghospels were written by greeks and they titled them "Evangels", which means "good news". Speaking of greek, I liked a lot the facing text in greek and coptic. I do suggest this edition of the book to curious ones, at the end of it all is a quick read.
Ham on Wonder Bread. .......2006-05-28
Meyers sandwiches the 114 sayings of Thomas (in English and Coptic), and his commentary on that text, between two essays: his introduction, and a dozen or so pages from the famous humanist, Harold Bloom.
The middle sections may or may not be worth the price of the book. (I haven't looked over the notes yet.) I find Thomas a bit "hammy," both in the sense that (having read a few Taoist and Buddhist works) Gnostic metaphysics strike me as pretentious, and in the sense that in their lack of historical or moral interest, they are "un-kosher," don't sound like a Jewish prophet. This doesn't sound like Jesus to me; it sounds like an Alexandrian philosopher. But it's worth reading Thomas for his importance in modern Jesus debates.
Surrounding the text one finds two slices of "wonder bread" of doubtful nutritional value.
Meyer properly attempts to put Thomas in context, but offers some dubious arguments in the process. He repeats the standard Jesus Seminar line that Q is very like Thomas. The view that Thomas is an early text is often based on the assumption that both are "sayings Gospels." (A rather oxymoronic concept.) More importantly, as I show in Why the Jesus Seminar can't find Jesus, and Grandma Marshall Could, Q is radically different from Thomas. First, even the Jesus Seminar version of Q contains some stories and miracles, which Thomas does not. More fundamentally, while Q contains some of the most profound moral teaching in all literature, Thomas edits almost all of it out. Q is 37-50% moral teaching; Thomas is about 2%, and even that can be pretty anemic. ("Don't lie, and don't do the things you hate.") Odd that a "sayings Gospel" would edit out the Sermon on the Mount! Even odder that Meyer does not notice! Nor do other Jesus Seminar scholars, Elaine Pagels, or Harold Bloom.
In fact, in my analysis of Thomas and the Gospels, I found that Thomas was less like the canonical Gospels than any other ancient writing I surveyed. The convention of calling it a "Gospel" at all is, in my opinion, highly dubious.
Meyer claims that the "absence of allegorical interpretations" in Thomas' version of the parable of the sower "helps confirm that such elements were added later," and therefore Thomas contains material that predates the Gospels. But scholars like Sanders and Jenkins have rebutted this argument. John Meier, N. T. Wright, and Richard Hays also give reason to believe Thomas depends on the canonical Gospels. Meyer is honest enough to admit that some scholars take this view. The problem is (I argue) "early Thomas" scholars get the worst of the debate. In fact, often they simply ignore opposing arguments. (Pagels admitted to me she had not read Meier or Wright's views on Thomas.)
While a good writer, Harold Bloom is in even further over his head. He uncritically accepts the view that Thomas offers an "earlier Jesus." Both Meyer and Bloom repeatedly cite Burton Mack, whose gifts, in my opinion, are more those of a myth-maker than a historian. Bloom also glibly repeats Meyer's error about Thomas being similiar to "Q."
Bloom expresses amazement that the Gospels contain only a few Aramaic sayings of Jesus: "If you believed in the divinity of Jesus, would you not wish to have preserved the actual Aramaic sentences he uttered?" The answer is, first of all, Jesus may have spoken mostly in Greek. But also, Bloom seems to have a less sophisticated and more magical notion of language than the early Christians. In the Christian Scriptures, Jesus is the "Logos," the translation into humanity of the nature of God. By speaking in different languages in Acts, the Holy Spirit in effect blessed all languages, and the act of translation.
Bloom asks, "Is it not an extraordinary scandal that all the crucial texts of Christianity are so suprisingly belated?" He should know better. The earliest extant Buddhist text is from 600 years after the Buddha. The earliest account of the resurrection, by contrast, was written a mere 20 years after the fact, and the first extant text is a mere 90-100 years later. Nor is 40 years (to Mark) so long; I could transcribe 1st hand accounts of the bombing of Nagasaki (where I once lived) tomorrow, from eyewitnesses, 61 years after the fact.
Misleading To Scientific Researchers .......2006-02-25
If you buy this book seeking futher knowledge of the man Jesus, you will discover the writing to be based on unbelievable script. It is totally unlike any other writings found regarding the person, the man, that lived two thousand years ago. Christ would have been appalled at events attributed to him and this book is unacceptable to any Christian. The gnostics were a sect of people who believed themselves to be enlightened and had a following just as many false teachers throughout the centuries have influenced the easily suggestible person.
This book was attributed to Thomas! This alone would defy belief in the script of this book as being written by the disciple. Although Thomas tended towards skepticism at Christ's ressurection, he stood in awe as he realized it was the man he had followed and believed to be the Son of God. Thomas undoubtedly would have condemned this book. To say a false teacher named Thomas may have written the book is possible, but the person who wrote the script appears to be having sport with the true follower of Christ.
I have just finished watching a rather informed history of the gnostics on the "History Channel", and the saga of their lives and travels were nothing new or wise, just as we find today in so-called scholars who endeavor to establish a scientific path of Christ's life. Men of yesterday were given to forgeries just as we find in our generation, so if you are in quest of the truth of the times and life of Jesus, forget it, you won't find it here.
Focus on the actual text...avoid the commentary.......2006-01-30
For any true believer and follower of Christ and his teachings, this book will most definitely be a rare and invaluable jewel. The mysteries, admonishments, knowledge, wisdom and understanding reflected by Christ in these sayings will speak to the very heart and spirit of the individual who is truly seeking. There is most definitely a direct correlation with the teachings, and sayings of Christ that are most familiar and recognized in the canonized four gospels.For the believer, my suggestion is to search and study these sayings as you would any other scripture, recognizing the living spirit behind all scripture that speaks to the spirit within.
My suggestion would be to purchase the book for its actual text, and not the unnecessary insertion of Harold Blooms dissertation found in the back of the book. His essay tries to separate the consistent unity behind the scriptures of the old and new testament; and to as well separate the Christ that is found in cannoned scripture from the Christ reflected in the writings of Thomas. However I suggest that the individual judge for themselves of how much benefit they will receive from the added insight.
Amazon.com
Richard Elliott Friedman's The Hidden Book in the Bible may be the most important literary discovery of our century. Or it may be a load of guano. The Hidden Book, like Michael Drosnin's The Bible Code, makes the audacious claim that its author has discovered a secret structure of meaning in the holy texts of Christianity and Judaism. Bucking more than a century of biblical textual criticism, Friedman claims that one author, probably a lay person, wrote many of the most familiar stories in the Hebrew Bible (including the stories of Adam and Eve, Abraham, Moses, and David) as one unified text. The Hidden Book's introduction defends this thesis with close readings of the patterns of punctuation, word choice, sentence structure, and allusion used in these stories; the remainder of the book is a reconstruction of what Friedman says is the original, foundational text at the heart of the Bible.
Unlike The Bible Code, Friedman's book abstains from making specific interpretive claims based on its findings. Yet Friedman does draw one lesson for contemporary readers from the story he has found--perhaps the only element of this book that will escape the controversy it is sure to cause. In an age of relativism, Friedman writes, "Suddenly this work comes back from nearly three thousand years ago. And it says yes, humans have the power to make judgments of what is good and bad and right and wrong. In this story, the creator of the earth does not always reveal what is good and bad, but rather the humans take the fruit that enables them to make these judgments." --Michael Joseph Gross
Book Description
Renowned biblical sleuth and scholar Richard Elliot Friedman reveals the first work of prose literature in the world-a 3000-year-old epic hidden within the books of the Hebrew Bible. Written by a single, masterful author but obscured by ancient editors and lost for millennia, this brilliant epic of love, deception, war, and redemption is a compelling account of humankind's complex relationship with God. Friedman boldly restores this prose masterpiece-the very heart of the Bible-to the extraordinary form in which it was originally written.
Customer Reviews:
Excellent scholarship; awkward translation.......2005-10-10
Richard Friedman could probably be called the Julius Wellhausen of modern biblical studies. Like Wellhausen did a century ago, Friedman has essentially updated, expanded, and clarified the Documentary Hypothesis so as to make a book on this subject from just 30 years ago seem hopelessly outdated. P in the postexilic period? Psssshaw...
While I had heard of this book before, I was naturally skeptical of its rather large claims, but after seeing the evidence for myself I agree with Friedman's conclusion- J and the Court History, as well as several texts in between, were written by the same author as part of a single narrative (perhaps initially "published" in two volumes), that covered the Hebrews' traditional history from creation to the accession of Solomon.
My only problem is with Friedman's translation of the work- I understand that it was his intention to translate the work as literally as possible, in order for the readers to get a feel of what it may have read like in Hebrew; nonetheless, this really made for awkward reading; I had to put the book down a couple times because the tedious vocabulary was giving me a headache. That may be what it's supposed to sound like in Hebrew, but in English it doesn't necessarily work.
However, the story and commentary are very well-written, the evidence is convincingly-presented, and, underneath the awkward translation, a genius of an author is remembered for the first time in over 2800 years. Worth it in my book.
Actual Oldest Example of Human Prose.......2005-07-30
The foremost scholar of the JEPD textual theory of the Torah, Friedman presents his scholarly notes and backgrounds, and the reconstructed text of what he understands to be the original story of the J text, thought to be the oldest narrative of the Torah, which uses Yahweh as the name of God.
Freidman's analytical reconstruction differs from that of Harold Bloom, in "The Book of J." Friedman find the J Writer in much of the material up through the Davidic monarchy of united Israel. Bloom follows the more conservative traditonal view that restricts the J document primarily to Genesis. Friedman interacts with Bloom and other textual critics and their theories.
Friedman presents strong stylistic, linguistic and thematic arguments that this original document goes from Genesis through the establishment of Solomon's reign. He further presents arguments confirming the antiquity of this deep strata of biblical material, proving that this is the oldest known example of prose in any language, as well as the first history (though all ancient "histories" are different in style from the modern western concept of history).
The author further deals critically with its relationship to the early material from the northern kingdom, commonly referred to as E, showing that they both were in final form and already being combined into a single document in Judah.
Together these constitute the two oldest examples of human prose, predating even Greek histories, previously claimed to be the earliest histories. Friedman closes with a devastating detailed argument against recent lines of argument claiming all the biblical texts were written in or after the Babylonian Exile.
Controversial, but fascinating.......2004-07-02
If you read Harold Bloom's "The Book Of J", you need to buy this.
The scholarly consensus over most of the past century was that the oldest Biblical stories were from the Yahwist (or "J") source. However, Friedman makes a pretty convincing argument that the J source and another Biblical source, the "Court History of David" were written by the same person. Of course, this means that J is much more recent than previously thought, since it could not pre-date the reign of Solomon (with whom the Court History ends).
Professor makes simple error.......2003-08-12
Notice that he lists Gen.32:3- 12 as Gen.32:4-13. I wonder how many points he takes off for that kind of mistake in his classroom?
Friedman errors.......2003-08-08
The translation was the best I have seen, but he still makes errors. He also has too way many verses from the original text. He did good tracing "J" in scoping out the original text, although there are some items in "J" that need to be deleted. Without a text to copy from after "J" Friedman gets lost. He is clueless as which verses should stay and which ones should go. He totally failed to catch the pattern of "J" in making the choice and in doing so has missed the real story and the real ironies. Kudos to him for discovering this ancient "prose" but he does not even know why they wrote the text. He actually thinks it is a prose story. He is wrong. When you know why the Iliad, or the Epic of Gilgalmish was written, then you will know why this book was written too.- It is an astrology/astronomy guide.
Average customer rating:
- A must for anyone seeking to know more of who Jesus is!
|
Christ, B.C.: Becoming Closer Friends With the Hidden Christ of the Old Testament
Bill Myers
Manufacturer: Gospel Light Pubns
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Paperback
 Study
| Old Testament
| Reference
| Christianity
| Religion & Spirituality
| Subjects
| Books
General
| Jesus
| Christianity
| Religion & Spirituality
| Subjects
| Books
Devotionals
| Worship & Devotion
| Christianity
| Religion & Spirituality
| Subjects
| Books
Christology
| Theology
| Christianity
| Religion & Spirituality
| Subjects
| Books
General
| Religion & Spirituality
| Subjects
| Books
Devotionals
| Spirituality
| Religion & Spirituality
| Subjects
| Books
Similar Items:
-
The Wager
ASIN: 0830713042 |
Customer Reviews:
A must for anyone seeking to know more of who Jesus is!.......1998-09-16
I've been a Christian for many years and read hundreds of Christian books. But Bill Myers has topped my list of favorites with this one. What a refreshing look at our loving Savior. Each time I read it, I am reminded that Christ is forever for me and desires a relationship with me so He can reveal more of Himself to me. You'll never see Christ in the same way after reading Christ B. C.
Average customer rating:
|
Between Heaven and Earth: Divine Presence and Absence in the Book of Ezekiel (Biblical and Judaic Studies)
John F. Kutsko
Manufacturer: Eisenbrauns
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Hardcover
Old Testament
| Criticism & Interpretation
| Reference
| Christianity
| Religion & Spirituality
| Subjects
| Books
General
| Reference
| Christianity
| Religion & Spirituality
| Subjects
| Books
General
| Christianity
| Religion & Spirituality
| Subjects
| Books
General
| Religion & Spirituality
| Subjects
| Books
Jewish Life
| Judaism
| Religion & Spirituality
| Subjects
| Books
Commentaries
| Hebrew Bible (Old Testament)
| Sacred Writings
| Judaism
| Religion & Spirituality
| Subjects
| Books
Criticism & Interpretation
| Hebrew Bible (Old Testament)
| Sacred Writings
| Judaism
| Religion & Spirituality
| Subjects
| Books
General
| Hebrew Bible (Old Testament)
| Sacred Writings
| Judaism
| Religion & Spirituality
| Subjects
| Books
All Titles
| Qualifying Textbooks - Fall 2007
| Stores
| Books
ASIN: 1575060418 |
Customer Reviews:
feminine in OT.......2007-01-09
Good for bible studies to get a sence of the Feminine lurcking in the Old Testament. Easy to read. Offs good discussion
Book Description
Ancient scriptures, hidden from the world for centuries, have recently attracted unprecedented popular attention. Some were found among the ancient library of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Others include assorted mystical writings known as Kabbalah, and a host of books that never made it into the Bible, called the Apocrypha (which means "hidden") and the Pseudepigrapha (called "false writings" by those who suppressed them). Additionally, there are the Gnostic texts of Nag Hammadi — a location in Egypt where a treasure trove of lost books was discovered in the middle of the twentieth century. Collectively, they comprise the "Lost Bible." For centuries, these manuscripts were systematically suppressed because their liberating messages of individual power and worth challenged the authority and pet philosophies of political and religious leaders.
In Secrets from the Lost Bible, Hebrew scholar Kenneth Hanson discovers common truths within these sacred books, truths that humankind appears destined to learn at this stage of our development. Hanson uncovers parallels and offers readers a clear interpretation of these sacred writings, hidden truths that, once grasped, can help us reach our fullest potential.
Customer Reviews:
Not what i thought but good.......2007-01-13
The authors interpretation of the Hidden Scriptures. More insight on how to live life. Just like the bible but what was really meant.
Not what I expected .......2006-07-28
I expected this book to be a some lost secrets of the biblical manuscripts searched out by a scholar. Instead it is nothing but a book of moral teachings pulled out of some of the early Jewish writings that were not included in the Jewish Tanakh, and the Catholic Apocrypha that was not carried into the Protestant Bible. He also draws teachings from the Nag Hammadi texts.Some of the "lost" books he uses is Judith, the book of Adam and Eve,the Gospel of Thomas, and the infancy Gospel of Thomas. He explores lessons in living in the worlds of knowing,being,feeling, and doing. If you enjoy Sunday sermons that tell a bible story then a lesson from it, you will like this book. Look else where for a serious study of these documents.
Book Description
Was Jesus really a subversive mystic whose true teachings were suppressed by an authoritarian church? Has the real nature of Christianity been deliberately obscured for centuries? Do recently discovered texts such as the Gospel of Thomas, the Gospel of Mary, and even the Dead Sea Scrolls undermine the historical validity of the New Testament? In this incisive critique, Philip Jenkins thoroughly and convincingly debunks such claims. Jenkins places the recent controversies surrounding the hidden gospels in a broad historical context and argues that, far from being revolutionary, such attempts to find an alternative Christianity date back at least to the Enlightenment. And by employing the appropriate scholarly and historical methodologies, he demonstrates that the texts purported to represent pristine Christianity were in fact composed long after the canonical gospels found in the Bible. Produced by obscure heretical movements, these texts offer no reliable new information about Jesus or the early church. They have attracted so much media attention chiefly because they seem to support radical, feminist, and post-modern positions in the modern church. Indeed, Jenkins shows how best-selling books on the "hidden gospels" have been taken up by an uncritical, scandal-hungry media as the basis for a social movement that could have dramatic effects on the faith and practice of contemporary Christianity. Brilliantly researched and sharply argued, Hidden Gospels unearths both the complex agendas and flawed methods of scholars who have created a whole new mythology about Jesus and the early church.
Customer Reviews:
Too lightweight for scholars, too heavy for average joes, but a lot of sense that ought to reach the public.......2005-12-03
Philip Jenkins' HIDDEN GOSPELS is an examination of the current fads of presenting non-canonical gospels as exciting, illuminating finds. Everyone has heard before, usually about the Gospel of Thomas found at Nag Hammadi in 1947, that some recently found document will show us what Jesus really taught, and how traditional Christianity bears little resemblance to the faith. The work might be seen as a complement to Luke Timothy Johnson's similar work THE REAL JESUS (San Francisco: Harper, 1997); where Johnson sought to reassure readers that the canonical gospels and epistles are trustworthy historical sources, Jenkins aims to show how the non-canonical writings are not.
Jenkins begins by explaining earlier waves of non-canonical mania, noting that the same views held today by groups like the Jesus Seminar were briefly entertained by earlier scholars but ultimately discarded just to rise again at the end of the 20th century. He also explains exactly what these non-canonical sources are. Since the Gospel of Thomas is the darling of the Jesus Seminar crowd, it takes a central place in his discussion. Many points of the Gospel of Thomas, he says, may in fact be authentic, and find corroboration with the hypothetical source of the synoptic gospels, Q. However, it was undoubtedly completed as a very late date (end of the 2nd century) and is filled with gnostic additions.
Having already brought up the subject of Gnosticism, Jenkins then gives a history of the movement, and makes the prudent conclusion that, whatever it was, it was not the original authentic Christianity. Using sources like the Pauline epistles and the writings of Polycarp and Ignatius, Jenkins says it is obvious that the liturgical, repentant church that came to shine as Christian orthodox was in fact the continuation original movement started by Jesus. Gnosticism, on the other hand, shows up only in the 2nd century and its leaders bend over backward to prove they have any claim to historicity.
Why are these claims so popular, that the non-canonical gospels tell the true story and maybe Gnosticism was the real deal? Jenkins notes the current influence of feminism on scholarship; some academics don't feel orthodox Christianty treats women correctly, and so it is out to show that heterodox traditions--which supposedly asserted the equality of the sexes--is the right way. And a rejection of tradition spread from these discontented academics to the public by way of a media that loves scandalous news.
My only real complaint about the work is that it is full of truths the public needs to hear--next time you hear a friend talking about how the evil patriarchal Catholic Church squashed Jesus' real teachings, this is the antidote--but it may be too brainy for laymen. Academics, on the other hand, will find the book far too lightweight. Perhaps we are still in need of a guide showing the waywardness of non-canonical sources that can be fearlessly given out to any fellow on the street.
Excellent Overview of Gospel Research and Current Cliches.......2004-09-06
A solid, excellent, easily readable and informative book on current notions about the Jesus of history, and about research in New Testament studies. When so many foolish ideas are floating around about what we know or don't know about Jesus Christ, books like this are needed. They help the public put things in some kind of perspective. Jesus is not simply a subject of secular study right now, he is a target. I recommend this book.
Not a serious work but has some value.......2004-02-10
I am an educated layman with an interest in Q, the Gospel of Thomas, and Gnosticism. I find the work that various scholars are doing in these areas fascinating but also a little speculative, and I looked forward to reading Philip Jenkins' critique of the work. I was therefore disappointed to find that his book is primarily a popular survey and contains essentially no academic-quality discussion of the issues.
I was not at all surprised that Jenkins takes conservative positions in the book; what did surprise me is how reluctant he is to say what exactly his positions are. This is true for many specific historical issues such as the date and authorship of various NT and apocryphal texts, and even more true for major spiritual and social issues such as the nature of the Kingdom of Heaven and the role of women in the church. He was also very sparing in his citation of "mainstream" scholars, and, though he implies that they are busily working over the same issues as the "fringe" scholars (liberals, feminists, and seekers, i.e. New Agers and other free-thinkers) with whom he is mostly concerned, he never gives any account or indeed any idea at all of what the mainstream scholars have been doing for the past thirty years.
One of the funniest parts of the book is where he bemoans how the fringe scholars (especially the members of the Jesus Seminar) have dominated most popular media (TV and press) coverage of NT issues in recent years. He notes how the programs and articles are always careful to show a semblance of balance and always include mainstream as well as fringe scholars, but they always let the fringe scholars set the agenda and have the last word. It is hardly a mystery why this is. The media is looking for news. Could it be that the mainstream scholars have nothing new to say?
The titles of the book are not very descriptive. Their content is roughly as follows:
1 Finding and Seeking - here's the problem (no real content)
2 Fragments of a Faith Forgotten - interest in NT apocrypha in the US in the 19th and first half of the 20th century
3 The First Gospels? Q and Thomas - like it says
4 Gospel Truth - other apocryphal texts, especially other Nag Hammadi texts
5 Hiding Jesus: The Church and the Heretics - the rise of organization and orthodoxy
6 Daughters of Sophia - The feminist perspective on NT and the early church
7 Into the mainstream - penetration of fringe people and ideas into mainstream institutions (churches, academia, society at large)
8 The Gospels in the Media - TV and press coverage of NT issues
9 The Next New Gospel - now you know (no real content)
I actually found the book fairly informative. The author tells a lot about who the fringe people are, what they think, and what books they have written. (The footnotes at the end of the book contain a huge amount of bibliographical information.) I especially appreciated the information about the work of women scholars and church members in chapters 2, 6 and 7. For me reading Jenkins is a lot like reading the great heresiologists (Irenaeus, Hippolytus and Epiphanius). The orthodoxy is kind of dull but the heresies are really interesting.
Jenkins Has Done It Again.......2004-02-09
This book needs to be taken for what it is. It's not a refutation of the Jesus Seminar and its findings, at least not primarily.
Rather, it is a sociological study of the modern "Quest for the Historical Jesus," including theories as to why it has taken the turns it has. This quest is not really a search for truth, as it is for self-validation of mores and principles deeply ingrained in the heart of modern, democratic man (eg. individualism, freedom from dogmatic strictures, etc.).
I think this book is an excellent companion to Luke Timothy Johnson's "The Real Jesus." (Johnson's book should be read for a specific critique of the Seminar and its methods.) The only fault I find with "Hidden Gospels" is Jenkins's tendency to repear himself over and over. This tendency is better syited to a classroom lecture rather than a book, I believe.
I wouldn't classify this book as a "must read," as I would Johnson's, but it's an excellent read nonetheless.
Like Johnson, I don't know if Jenkins can be said to have a conservative bias. If so, I don't see why on earth he ever would have left Catholicism for Anglicanism. The Anglican Communion isn't exactly known for moral conservatism or dogmatic conviction. I think this is why orthodox Christians, especially Catholics, find him so appealing. "Why would a 'liberal' support 'conservative' positions unless they were genuinely true?"
With cleverly disguised works of pseudo-scholarship like "The da Vinci Code" making the bestseller lists, "Hidden Gospels: How the Search for Jesus Lost Its Way" is a well-needed wake-up call for those wanting a clearer understanding of American religion, and the directions it has been, and is, heading.
Jesus Seminarians, eat your soup!.......2004-01-28
Hidden Gospels is like a bowl of split pea soup: nourishing, filling, but not what you would order at a fancy French restaurant. This bowl of history soup is just the cure if you have bought into radical Jesus theories. With caution, balance, fine judgement, and scholarly courtesy, (qualities often missing from works of the Jesus Seminar, still less the even more fringe stuff) Jenkins writes an excellent general survey of modern errors in the "search for Jesus." He concludes (rightly, I think) that the Gnostic and other "new gospels" have little if anything to say about Jesus, and that they are inferior to the canonical Gospels, both as historical sources and in terms of social merit. (Actually I think he goes too easy on Thomas, but that is another story.)
Probably the greatest contribution of this book is its discussion of the radical Jesus theories as modern myth, and the social forces that create that myth. He discusses not only scholars, such as Crossan, Funk, Mack, Pagels, and King, but also how their ideas "filter down" to the masses through junk novels, television, and movies. (A pity he didn't write this book after The Da Vinci Code and Pagel's new Thomas book; though it is always interesting to see people blunder into a trap publicly laid and waiting.)
Jenkins argues that the Gospels are superior to the Gnostics in terms of historical believability and social value. It is indeed ironic that the very people who blame Christianity for being mysogenist, distrustful of the body, and hierarchical, prefer Gnostic writings that (he suggests, and I also suspect) were probably the source of these qualities in later Christianity.
Elaine Pagel's best-selling new book, Beyond Belief, could almost have been written to illustrate Jenkins points. Jenkins reads hundreds of scholars with whom he disagrees, and carefully, politely points out their errors. Pagels, by contrast, could not be troubled to name a single scholar who dissents from her views, even such respected and careful historians as John Meier, N.T. Wright, or Jenkins himself. Nor do the Jesus Seminar' popular "Five Gospels" or "Complete Gospels" answer their critics. Radical biblical "scholarship" seems to be a hothouse phenomena, flourishing in a highly protected environment. Hidden Gospels is in part an explanation of this odd phenomena.
The main defects of this book have to do with Jenkin's methodological conservatism. The book is sometimes repetitive, the style sometimes ponderous. His refutations of Crossan and company are not as witty and fun as, say, N.T. Wright. Also, while Jenkins is wise to appeal to "consensus scholarly views," I wish he would have discussed the Gospels and Gnostic writings directly more than he does. (A fault he shares with Pagels.) Personally, I think the best argument for the Gospels, and against the Gnostics, is the works themselves. I can't see how anyone who has read both sets of documents can confuse them.
Hidden Gospels, despite its styllistic flaws, is a vitally important and high-quality historical study. I hope future skeptical historians, and their publishers, will carefully consider the points Jenkins makes before throwing intellectual cotton candy like "Hidden Gospel of Thomas" or "Complete Gospel" at us, 99%air. Try the soup instead.
author, Jesus and the Religions of Man
Average customer rating:
|
The Antioch Factor: The Hidden Message of the Book of Acts
Ross Paterson
Manufacturer: Regal Books
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Paperback
General
| Reference
| Christianity
| Religion & Spirituality
| Subjects
| Books
Study
| New Testament
| Reference
| Christianity
| Religion & Spirituality
| Subjects
| Books
Church Institutions & Organizations
| Ministry & Church Leadership
| Christianity
| Religion & Spirituality
| Subjects
| Books
New Testament
| Bibles
| Christianity
| Religion & Spirituality
| Subjects
| Books
General
| Religion & Spirituality
| Subjects
| Books
ASIN: 1852402849 |
Book Description
Do you belong to a 'Jerusalem church' or an 'Antioch church'? Is it wrapped up in its own programs or priorities, so that it is ineffective in spreading the Gospel? Or is it so concerned for the lost that its priorities are driven by the mandate of the Great Commission?
Book Description
A fresh look at this ancient text reveals a Jesus you never knew
Matthew's gospel has been read and cherished by people around the world for almost two thousand years. But there is something hidden in the text that most readers fail to uncover—the true words and actions of Jesus that lie behind layers of interpretation from the community of first Christians.
The Hidden Gospel of Matthew: Annotated and Explained takes you deep into the text to discover the words and events that have the strongest connection to the historical Jesus. What did Jesus really say about the future of the world? What really took place after his crucifixion? Ron Miller reveals the underlying story of Matthew, a story that transcends the traditional theme of an atoning death and focuses instead on Jesus's radical call for personal transformation and social change. This hidden portrait of Jesus at times resembles the sage teacher of the Gospel of Thomas more than it does the redeemer of traditional Christianity, and presents truths consonant with our deepest human experience.
Book Description
Bridging the gap between the historical Jesus of the scholar and the Jesus of faith of Christian believers, this book will appeal to anyone looking for an alternative spiritual vision of Jesus and his message.
Customer Reviews:
Nothing New.......2006-01-03
Three stars may be a bit generous. The author presents his alternate translations of the gospels as new and unencumbered by centuries of politically motivated clergy and scholars. However, there is nothing new, nothing ground breaking here. Douglas-Klotz would have us believe that scholars, both ancient and modern, have ignored the alternatives he proposes, and that the verdict of centuries of evolution in biblical translation and exegesis have it all wrong. He would also have us believe that modern scholars are either ignorant of ancient Aramaic or deliberately continue some "Da Vinci Code" cover-up of the "real Jesus." Sorry "Da Vinci Codes" fans, but there is no cover-up, no attempt to "hide" Jesus by the evil Church. There are very good reasons why the Gospel of Thomas and other writings, well known for centuries, did not make it into the cannon of scripture. The various modern translations of the Christian Teatament are based on critical scholarship that involves the consideration of historical, archeological, and literary context. The choice of translation is a painstaking and multi-disciplinary process, something the author does not demonstrate. Rather, he simply offers his own personal preferences in translation that sound biased in favor of what some have called "New Age," but what I suspect is based on his own Sufi belief system. While I certainly respect this spirituality, it bears no resemblence to the linguistic, historical, and literary evidence that has been well established about Jesus of Nazareth. The reader who would know the "real" Jesus would be well served by reading the classic "Jesus Before Christianity" by Albert Nolan. While it will not please the "New Age" reader, it will provide a deeply spiritual and scholarly approach to the Jesus that sparked the greatest spiritual revolution in history. Having said all this, I must say that I find the author's translations intriguing and, if put in perspective, may add something of value to the prayer life of Christians not bound by conservativism. But, really, there is nothing out there that establishes Jesus as a mystic!
Ancient renderings are suspiciously modern........2005-04-27
All right, I admit it - I never finished this book, even after three tries. Why? Because the author's renderings of the New Testament Greek into the original Aramaic were so embarrassingly contrived to dovetail with modern New Age and feminist concepts that I just couldn't take it any more.
Don't get me wrong - I am all for the effort to get behind the Greek to the (presumably) original Aramaic to see if new light can be shed on difficult, ambiguous, or controversial passages of the New Testament. But Douglas-Klotz takes such liberties with his translations that we are moved farther away from - not closer to - the world of Jesus. He tries too hard to make the text come alive, and we are left with fluff (e.g., addressing God as "Father/Mother") that has no credibility when attributed to first-century Jews. Compared to Douglas-Klotz's overblown and pretentious "renderings," the straightforwardness of the original Greek comes as a profound relief.
Scholarship is one thing, but pandering to people's biases is quite another. Douglas-Klotz is guilty of the latter, and the reader will have to look elsewhere for a credible effort to unveil the Aramaic underpinnings of the New Testament.
Beautiful!.......2004-07-13
The only complaint that I have about this book, is the explanation (which is repeated at least once per chapter), that this is merely the author's own interpretation of Scripture, and he encourages his readers to do their own research. While I am no expert in the Aramaic language, I do have some understanding of the nuances of the Semitic languages, and how difficult it is to translate from one language to another. So this particular translation is merely one of many. This author's interpretation of the Holy Scripture does give me pause, and I intend to learn some Aramaic, and study such early Bibles as the Dead Sea Scrolls, so I may have a deeper understanding of the Bible and Jesus' message.
New Age folk still coming out of the woodwork.......2004-05-16
It's not surprising that folk gravitate to such a CLAIM of new revelation as that made by Douglas-Klotz. This is certainly not the first time (and probably not the last) that vast numbers have been taken in by a RE-WRITING of portions of the Bible based upon a pretense of scholarship. What a contemplation . . . that minds are disposed to find this one man's translation of the Bible more trustworthy than that of Tyndale or that produced by the panel assembled for the King James Version (constituted by MANY linguistic experts in ancient languages with credentials far exceeding and out-weighing that of Douglas-Klotz)! Even Young, Darby, and a host of others having independently corroborated the accuracy of these earlier translations doesn't seem to constitute much of an impediment for folk rushing head-long into the opines of Douglas-Klotz' claim to "new revelation" based upon HIS linguistic expertise.
The Bible's proverb states "there is safety in the multitude of counselors" - and how easily that truth is jettisoned and substituted with one man's claim to accuracy accompanied by what is merely "a multitude of OPINIONS" of his groupies! Of course OPINIONS are often disguised under a cloak and claim of scholarship, and in this case an intriguing offer of Aramaic freshly spoken and heard is yet a further enticement. But how sad that so many will embrace the spiritual SPIN on such crucial texts of the Bible simply because it is interlaced with the offers that the author makes with regard to being able to hear the texts in their original language.
As Douglas-Klotz opines his view - egg-headed pundits and readers who have a dearth for critical thinking seem to be scurrying in much haste to make this all out to be a bonafide "new revelation"! Is it that they are merely finding great contentment in a "translation" (really merely an "interpretation") of the scriptural texts that steal away the proper rendering that would lay bare their soul's need for God's redemption? - - - However, the full context of Jesus' teaching and that of the Bible in its entirety points to and emphasizes mankind's need for salvation and how that salvation is found ONLY in Jesus.
The author's New Age slant that would obviate that is unmistakable (even though it comes under the guise of "translation" and cloaked in some ability in the Mid-eastern languages). It's clear to me that most of the other reviewers' commentaries that I've read point to how they are eager to embrace this author's slant. (That is understandable in that it leaves open, meshes with, promotes, and affords the widest path possible for accommodating the varied opinions over what is spiritual truth.) This so falls in line with the Bible's explanation as to REALLY why the gospel is HIDDEN to so many: It is hidden to those whose hearts remain closed to God and what He genuinely declares (see Matthew 13:10-16; 1 Cor.2:6-8; 2 Cor.3:14, & 2 Cor.4:3-4).
Yet notwithstanding, the intellectual banter will undoubtedly go on between those who have genuine revelation from God and those whose minds are blinded by the state of their own unredeemed hearts . . .
Towards the One.......2003-07-22
I am really grateful to Neil Douglas Klotz to have written this book because his translation based on his heart felt mystical point of view allowed me to reconcile myself to Jesus and his teaching. (I was an altar boy who left the catholic church as a teenager). His interpretation shows to the mystic that Jesus teaching is similar in content to all the great teachings of all the great spiritual traditions. The emphasis is on experiencing and manifesting the qualities of being in the spirit of love, harmony and beauty.
Books:
- The Gospel of Thomas: The Hidden Sayings of Jesus
- The Illustrated World's Religions: Guide to Our Wisdom Traditions, A
- The Indian Way: An Introduction to the Philosophies & Religions of India (2nd Edition)
- The Inspired Aquarium: Ideas and Instruction for Living with Aquariums
- The Lost Christianities: The Battles for Scripture and the Faiths We Never Knew
- The Man Who Heard Voices: Or, How M. Night Shyamalan Risked His Career on a Fairy Tale
- The Meditative Mind
- The Osha: Secrets of the Yoruba-Lucumi-Santeria Religion in the United States and the Americas : Initiation, Rituals, Ceremonies, Orishas, Divination, Plants, s
- The Peacemaker: A Biblical Guide to Resolving Personal Conflict
- The Practice of the Presence of God
Books Index
Books Home
Recommended Books
- Undaunted Courage: Meriwether Lewis, Thomas Jefferson, and the Opening of the American West
- The Beach House Cookbook
- Journal of Delacroix
- History: Fiction or Science
- Journey Of Souls: Case Studies of Life Between Lives
- Medical Firsts: From Hippocrates to the Human Genome
- One River
- How to Retire Early and Live Well With Less Than a Million Dollars
- Influence: The Formula for Success
- Furniture Retailing in Canada; a Report on the State of the Industry.
The Secret Teachings of Jesus: Four Gnostic Gospels
The Gospels of Mary: The Secret Tradition of Mary Magdalene, the Companion of Jesus
The Gospel of Thomas: Annotated & Explained (Skylight Illuminations,)
The Gospel of Mary Magdalene
The Lost Books of the Bible
